Skip to Content

Writing at Landmark College

At Landmark College, we begin writing instruction with the assumption that all students are capable of becoming better writers.

Artwork that says 2023 Exemplary WAC Program with logos for the WAC Clearing House and Association for Writing Across the CurriculumWe believe developing writers benefit from regular practice, from collaboration with and guided support from experienced writers and teachers. All writers have more to learn, and practice, feedback, revision, and reflection are all critical to writers’ development.

Our goal is to help students become better writers, to develop abilities and practices that will transfer with them and allow them to be successful in new and varied writing contexts as they move through college and beyond.

Writing is both an activity and a subject of study, and our curriculum promotes the development of writers’ abilities and the increase in their knowledge of the nature of writing and rhetoric.

Writing is a physical and emotional and cognitive activity.

We keep all these domains in mind as we work with diverse learners and provide multiple opportunities for students to receive instruction and to practice and demonstrate what they are learning.

View our Glossary of Writing and Reading Terms

View Resources for Faculty

Learn more about writing at Landmark College:

  • Writing Across the Curriculum, a nationwide movement, is based on the belief that students will learn more and become better thinkers and communicators if they write consistently and repeatedly throughout their college courses.

    Writing Across the Curriculum at Landmark College (WAC@LC) was created in 2019 and grew out of the work of the Landmark College Writing Project, a 4.5-year project funded by a generous grant from the Davis Educational Foundation, which was established by Stanton and Elisabeth Davis after Mr. Davis's retirement as chairman of Shaw's Supermarkets, Inc.

    Our mission is to ensure that students in all degree programs have frequent and meaningful opportunities to write, revise, and discuss their writing in courses from their freshman year to graduation.

    WAC@LC works with faculty at the college to strengthen and align our approach to writing instruction, assignment, and assessment across all departments and all levels.

    We provide ongoing faculty workshops and consultation services, work with academic support services, and create accessible resources for faculty and students with the goal of helping student writers become more effective and confident.

    For more information about WAC at Landmark College, please email [email protected].

  • Writing Across the Curriculum at Landmark College (WAC@LC): Statement of Mission and Goals

    Approved by WAC@LC Program Team, April 2022
    Approved by the Faculty Senate, April 2023


    Writing Across the Curriculum at Landmark College (WAC@LC) seeks to promote a college-wide culture in which the study of writing and the development of writing practices are understood to be valuable and essential for communication, thinking, learning, constructing meaning, achieving goals, and fostering awareness of self and others.

    WAC@LC is grounded in the beliefs that writing and reading are interrelated and complementary activities and abilities, and that college students’ development as writers and readers is ongoing. Responsibility for this development is shared among all faculty at the college, across levels and disciplines/degrees.

    We provide resources and opportunities for conversation, consultation, and support to faculty who use writing in their courses, to staff who support student writers, and to students working to become effective, confident, and flexible writers and readers in a variety of contexts. 

    Central to our WAC mission is the belief that when students are given frequent opportunities for writing across the curriculum, they think more critically and creatively, engage more deeply in their learning, and are better able to transfer what they have learned from course to course, context to context.


    In pursuit of this mission Writing Across the Curriculum at Landmark College (WAC@LC) pursues the following goals:

    • Promote the development and use of writing practices for both learning and communication across all levels and disciplines of the curriculum (“learning to write” and “writing to learn”).
    • Provide opportunities for faculty collaboration and ongoing professional development related to writing and reading pedagogy, including group sessions and individual consultation.
    • Promote understanding of the concepts and principles that cut across all writing tasks. 
    • Create and share support resources for all faculty who assign writing and use writing in their classes.
    • Create accessible resources to support students in their ongoing growth as writers, readers, and thinkers.
    • Advise and advocate for clearly articulated threads of writing practice and instruction across our curriculum, disciplines, and degrees.
    • Engage in assessment of student learning outcomes related to writing and reading.
  • Landmark College recognizes that writing is a complex and challenging cognitive process and one of the greatest academic difficulties for many of our students.

    Students enroll in a two-course, required freshman composition and rhetoric sequence as part of their college requirements.

    Additional required writing courses appear in sophomore, junior, and senior year, depending on a student’s chosen degree program.

    Landmark College students benefit from working with experienced faculty in the classroom and office hours, and additional support is offered in our Drake Center for Academic Support (DCAS). Some writers benefit from assistive technology to increase their written output, and some may need extra time to develop and implement a successful writing process.

  • Landmark College writing faculty are guided by the principles listed below in all our work with students. 

    1. Writing is best taught as an individualized, strategic, recursive, flexible, multi-stage process.
    2. All writing exists within a rhetorical situation; attention should be paid to the interrelationships of writer, audience, message, purpose, and genre.
    3. Writing and reading are interrelated and complementary activities and abilities.
    4. We differentiate between low-stakes preliminary stage writing and high-stakes completed drafts ready for submission and evaluation.
    5. Writing generates thinking and allows for discovery while writing. Writers do not have to have fully formed ideas before they begin writing.
    6. We appreciate the pedagogical role that formative evaluation and feedback play in a writer’s development, and we respond to students’ writing in ways that honor students’ strengths and are attuned to each student’s unique situation and abilities.
    7. Deadline policies should be clearly articulated and designed to encourage prompt work completion. These policies should also allow for appropriate flexibility to account for the different rates at which students develop effective writing habits and skills related to meeting deadlines.
    8. While we value correctness and teach editing skills, we believe that good writing has essential qualities that are more important, such as clarity, focus, support, and coherence. We also recognize that a large body of research supports the finding that de-contextualized grammar instruction has little effect on students’ abilities to write clear, correct prose.
    9. We understand that a student’s ability to write clear, error-free sentences is contextual and may decrease when encountering assignments and ideas that are complex and cognitively challenging. Too much concern for correctness in early stages of a writing process may also inhibit a student’s ability to articulate complex ideas. Editing is best left to later stages of a writing process.
    10. We do not edit or make corrections for students; instead we work with students to teach them how to become stronger editors of their own work.
    11. Writing does not have to be graded to serve as a tool for learning and for developing thinking skills.
    12. Summative evaluation is dependent on context and should be based on identified evaluation criteria and stated learning outcomes for any individual assignment. In other words, all possible elements of writing need not be assessed for all assignments.
  • Landmark College writing instruction is designed to prepare students to ask these questions of all writing tasks.  Question 1: Need or Exigence/Why we write. What conversation, question, situation, and context am I responding to? How does this impact how, when, and what I write? Question 2: Critical thought/Engaging w/ texts, ideas, others. Do I need to summarize, analyze, synthesize, or interpret for this task? What are appropriate claims and evidence suited to this task? How can I use resources or research for this task? Question 3: Conventions/“Rules” and expectations. What are the expectations for correctness and use of language for this task? What citation and referencing rules do I need to follow? Question 4: Genre. Different situations require different forms of writing. What disciplinary or discourse community expectations do I need to consider? Which forms of writing are appropriate for this task? How can model structures guide me? Question 5: Audience/Our readers. Who will read my work? What do they

Back to top